Fallingstar1971's Page

More from Fallingstar1971

Forum Posts

Comments

Posted on: Nibiru, 2012, Q&A from NASA, all 2012 discussi...
at 11/22/2009 9:19pm

A couple of problems.

1. Each sign is not the same size. When applying math one must evenly divide 360/12 for the size ... more(+)

A couple of problems.

1. Each sign is not the same size. When applying math one must evenly divide 360/12 for the size of each sign.

2. Even if item 1 is dismissed, the ancient Greeks, Mayans, Babylonians, Chinese, and other cultures all had their own charts with their own boundaries, When discussing a term as ancient and fa-reaching as an Age (in this context) modern boundaries are not necessarily up to the task at hand.

3. If I were to invoke Astrology, then we would be on the Cusp of Pisces and Aquarius.

4.Where, exactly, in Pisces? Which direction is it Precessing? And how far to Aquarius? I said leaving, not left, not arrived.

Star close(-)

Posted on: Nibiru, 2012, Q&A from NASA, all 2012 discussi...
at 11/22/2009 4:20am

OK

 more(+)

OK

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession

Start there

Learn the Zodiac. Where will the sun be on the next Spring Equinox? The answer is the age we are in today.
This is how it has been done all the way back to Plato and beyond. The names of the constellations may have changed but the phenomena has not.

No Mumbo Jumbo there

So declare whatever you want. The fact of the matter is this. If you want to understand the ancients, you MUST examine their methods and beliefs. If you want to understand yourself, then examine YOUR declarations and beliefs. (Coincidentally, your "Age of Thursday" coincides with the beginning of the "Age of Aquarius" (in case you dont wish to figure it out for yourself))

The King James Bible says in the gospel that Jesus said "And I will be with you until the end of the world"
Other translations say "And I will be with you until the end of the AGE"
Age we are leaving? Pisces
(pssst google "The Bible" and look at the different versions)
(pssst google Christianity and Pisces if you need help connecting the dots....)

No mumbo Jumbo there.......

So which is it?

End of the World, or end of an Age?

A Galactic year (or cosmic year) is the length of time it takes the Sun to do one orbit around the Galactic center. No Mumbo Jumbo there either. (I said Galactic Clock.....I suppose the clock would be the Milky Way itself since it keeps track of the year.) So let me be clear, The year starts over. The galaxy will not "reset" but the calender does.

Defense Rests

Star close(-)

Posted on: Time travel and the second law of thermodynamics
at 11/20/2009 12:48am

OK let me try this another way

Proxima 4.7 ly away
Earth 0 ly away

OK we see Earth as it is now and ... more(+)

OK let me try this another way

Proxima 4.7 ly away
Earth 0 ly away

OK we see Earth as it is now and Proxima as it was 4.7 years ago.

I teleport you 1 ly away. You take some readings.

Earth appears as it did 1 year ago
Proxima appears as it did 3.7 years ago

I teleport you 2 ly away. You take some readings

Earth appears as is did 2 years ago
Proxima 2.7 years ago.

As you teleport away, Each time you re-appear 1 ly farther away and one year back in time (looking back at Earth)
Now I teleport you straight to Proxima, and send another person out into space on the same course.

From Proxima, Earth appears as it did 4.7 years ago.
I teleport new guy one light year away

You look at new guy, he just moved forward in time one year. (from your point of view) I look at the new guy, he has moved backward in time (I see him one year older from earth, his light is a year old) Now you see him 3.7 years into the past. Once he arrives, he will catch up to your present.

Now, I teleport him out one ly. It took no time for him to get there at all. He turns around and turns on his light drive.
Now remember, from his point of view, he is one year into the past. After all, he is seeing Earth as it was one year ago. If he (not me) teleported to Earth from his location,(not mine) he would arrive one year in the past. But since he has to use his light drive, he wont arrive for another year, theraby catching him up to the time he left.

My point being is that I never sent him through time at all. I changed his spatial co-ords and by doing so, moved him through time. The trick is how quickly you can change your location in space

Star close(-)

Posted on: Time travel and the second law of thermodynamics
at 11/19/2009 7:51am

OK Lets let logic run a bit farther...........

If I instantaneously transport you 1 ly away, you will see one ly into ... more(+)

OK Lets let logic run a bit farther...........

If I instantaneously transport you 1 ly away, you will see one ly into the past when you look back at Earth. (I will use my Einsteinian Compensator to cancel out relativity for your transport. Fictional yes, but I need to get you out there FAST)

NOW how could I beam you back? You, looking at me, are seeing one year into the past. From your new POV. I havent perfected my transporter yet and the only way home for you is up to you.

So lets say, that you has a light drive that can go c. (Invented and tested before Einsteinian Compensator, unable to break the light barrier, but it can go c, but thats ALL it can do)

It will still take you one year to get home. You could conceivably arrive right after I transported you (from my POV) Even though you just traveled for an entire year to get back.

So even if I perfected the transporter, the Universe as a whole entity (1 universe=1 universe) would balance itself out

But the above scenario seems to perfectly demonstrate why FTL is so unrealizable. Once you started you trip, you could never return. Every jump takes you farther and farther into the past. Or does it?

So you jump out, you are one year into the past. You turn around and jump back. When you arrive, is it your "time" (from your POV) or are you still one year into the past?

Every light year you jump away is one more year into the past you are going

Reverse logic says that for every light year closer I get to Earth, I should be traveling forward in time (If I stop every light year for course corrections or whatever, I will progressively see another year pass)

Ok. SO now I can get you out there, and you can get back, and Time SEEMS to be behaving, so let me add just one more thing.

If we set a course with our Supership, (say, to Proxima Centauri) As you travel away from Earth, going into the past, for every year you go back in time on Earth, you are going FORWARD in time one year on Proxima.)

So even though your going backward in time to one place, your also going forward in time according to another place, and this is all happening AT THE SAME TIME.

So again, the Universe balances itself out.

I really dont think we could destabilize the Universe. Whatever you invent, whatever you do.

We are products of the Universe. All of us. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. Our energy came from the big bang. The energy for our space ship came from the big bang. All of this energy was accounted for in the beginning.

Every power source, all of it is but a tiny fraction of this accounted energy.
We ourselves are but a tiny fraction of that same energy

So no matter how much energy we release, the Universe as a whole can and will balance itself out. Only another Universe feeding energy to or taking energy from us could upset that balance.

Not even time travel itself can break it. As I just described, the Universe will always arrange itself so that it will balance.

Or would it be more accurate to say that no matter what we do, the Universe will adjust Reality so that everything balances out and all laws are obeyed?

Star close(-)

Posted on: Time travel and the second law of thermodynamics
at 11/17/2009 6:33am

I dunno, your moving mass from one point to another

If space and time are really spacetime, then any change in one ... more(+)

I dunno, your moving mass from one point to another

If space and time are really spacetime, then any change in one would require an effect in the other.

If I sent you back in time 1 year, the Universe would still weigh the same. This is because you no longer exist in my "when" so the doubling of mass in your "when" balances out. The Universe, containing ALL whens, stays the same.

If I chop off my finger and attach it to my toe, my weight stays the same (morbid yes, but you get my point)

If space and time are part of the same thing, if I move you in time I should have to move you in space as well.

If space and time are part of the same thing, then by moving you in space, I should be moving you in time (if I instantaneously moved you 1 light year away, and you looked back at Earth with a strong enough Telescope, you could conceivably see yourself getting ready for your trip, for you will be seeing one year into the past)

If space and time are part of the same thing, moving an object from one point inside the Universe to another point inside the Universe will not change its overall weight. (For at point A the object no longer exists, it has moved to point B.)

If space and time are part of the same thing, then by moving an object from one "when A" in the Universe to another "when B" in the Universe should not change its overall weight, for it ceases to exist in one of the "when A", it has moved to "When B"

The Universe contains both time and space. They are both parts of the Universe. The Universe as a whole. All of time, All of space, contained in one Universe. Again, changing locations in this model of the Universe should not change its weight

But that brings up another interesting question. Two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time.

As silly as it sounds, it also means that two objects cannot occupy the same space (mass would indeed double)

And it means that no two objects can exist at the same point of time. (you cannot overlay a future you over a past you.
There would have to be two of you. You exist in both time and space, and your true location in the Universe is based on this description, so two of you would not be able to exist in the same time, because since space and time are part of the same thing, the same time means the same space.)

If space and time are part of the same thing, then that right there could stop you in your tracks (at least from traveling within your own lifetime)


I guess I will close by saying that any instantaneous movement in space causes an equally instantaneous movement in time.

But in order for that you need to be FTL

Star close(-)

Commented on: NASA Launches In-House Patch Contest to Mark Shuttle Era's End
at 2009-11-17 10:58:07

How about a Phoenix, wings ablazed with the caption "Against all the Odds..." on top

And the years on the bottom ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: NASA Unveils Plan to Free Stuck Mars Rover Spirit
at 2009-11-14 10:10:56

If you cant back it out then try this.

Order the wheels to spin at max speed for 15 secs

Do this several times. The ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: Space Junk Threat Delays Japanese Spaceship's Station Departure
at 2009-10-30 09:38:37

it comes down to this........

1. Clean up LEO........not going to happen....cost too much, whatever. Bottom line, its ... more(+)

 close(-)

Commented on: Starhopping 101: Find the Andromeda Galaxy
at 2009-10-23 09:59:21

Take a good long look people, that galaxy is comming to DESTROY yours........MUWAHAHAHAHHAHAHA



Star

Commented on: Big Asteroid Less Likely to Hit Earth
at 2009-10-08 14:19:30

Umm, its bigger than 2 football fields, would that be enough mass to counter the launch vehical?

Going there to ... more(+)

 close(-)